Back
Issue
Return to home page
Invited article
PDF(0.1M)
Franklin OM*, Burch M**. Dilated cardiomyopathy in childhood. Images Paediatr Cardiol 2000;2:3-10
*
Specialist Registrar in paediatric cardiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
**
Consultant Paediatric Cardiologist, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
 
MeSH
Cardiomyopathy, congestive Myocarditis/diagnosis Heart transplantation
Prognosis
Abstract
Dilated Cardiomyopathy is an uncommon disease in children but morbidity and mortality in affected patients are high. This review discuses clinical presentation, diagnosis, medical management and prognosis of the condition, with an emphasis on recent advances that have influenced management of these children.

Article

Presentation and investigation dilated cardiomyopathy
 
At the time of presentation the child with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is usually in symptomatic cardiac failure, and at initial assessment, it is important to differenciate this condition from bronchiolitis. The chest x-ray features of increased cardiothoracic ratio, with evidence of lateral bronchial displacement due to left atrial enlargement and pulmonary plethora in association with hepatomegaly, raises clinical suspicion of the diagnosis (figure 1). 
Figure 1: Chest x-ray in a child with dilated cardiomyopathy 
Echocardiography is confirmatory showing dilatation of cardiac chambers, with or without mitral regurgitation (figure 2), and reduced ventricular function on M Mode analysis. It is very important to exclude mural thrombus on echocardiogram as its presence requires urgent treatment.
 

Figure 2a: Echocardiographic apical four chamber view
of dilated cardiomyopathy - note mitral regurgitation
Apical 4 chamber-colour
MPEG 1
Click here to view echo proper 
(253K)
 
Figure 2b: Echocardiographic parasternal long axis view
of dilated cardiomyopathy
Parasternal long axis-B&W
MPEG 1
Click here to view echo proper 
(227K)
 
Figure 2c: Echocardiographic parasternal long axis view
of dilated cardiomyopathy - note mitral regurgitation
Parasternal long axis-colour
MPEG 1
Click here to view echo proper 
(132K)
 
Both coronary arteries should be identified in an attempt to exclude anomalous origin of the left coronary artery form the pulmonary artery although this can be difficult 1 and angiography may be required (figure 3).
 
 Figure 3: Aortogram in anomalous origin
of left coronary artery
Aortogram
MPEG 1
Click here to view angio proper 
(576K)
 
The electrocardiogram may be more useful in this respect showing deep Q waves in lead I and wide Q waves in lead AVL, where the origin of the left coronary artery is anomalous.2

More commonly in idiopathic DCM sinus tachycardia, increased left ventricular voltages and ischaemic changes are seen on ECG at presentation. The QRS complex may be broad due to conduction disturbance and evidence of right atrial hypertrophy and left atrial hypertrophy is sometimes evident. 24 hour ECG monitoring will exclude chronic tachycardia with secondary ventricular dilatation e.g. permanent junctional reciprocal tachycardia, which is associated with a moderate increased heart rate and an abnormal P axis and will also identify children with secondary arrhythmias.

Differential diagnosis
There are a number of alternate diagnoses that need to be excluded at the time of presentation, as management and therapeutic strategies may need to be altered accordingly. Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery, the ECG features of which are described above, usually presents at 2-3 months and can be confirmed at cardiac catheter. This condition is surgically correctable. Myocarditis is more difficult to diagnose with accuracy but an attempt should be made as spontaneous resolution is likely and short-term mechanical support may be more appropriate than referral for transplantation. Positive viral cultures or increased antibody titres on paired serum samples may help. Common causes include viral infection with coxachie, echo, HIV, measles, mumps and rubella but all families of micro-organisms have been implicated. Myocardial biopsy is rarely indicated, because of the risk.

In most children dilated cardiomyopathy is a sporadic condition of unknown cause. However familial cases have been reported with autosomal dominant with incomplete penetrance, recessive and x-linked inheritance patterns described. Michels et al3 demonstrated a prevalence of familial disease in 20% of index cases in a prospective study where asymptomatic first-degree relatives were screened. No features specific to familial disease have been identified. It is our policy to offer such screening, and this needs to be handled sensitively.

DCM as a secondary disease
DCM is rarely due to systemic disease however as myocardial damage may be reversible with treatment of the underlying pathology it is essential to attempt to rule out metabolic, endocrine, storage, mitochondrial and connective tissue disorders at first presentation. Blood may be taken for lactate, glucose, amino acids, carnitine and acylcarnitine, cholesterol and triglycerides, thyroid function, creatinine kinase, iron and iron binding capacity and uric acid. A full blood count to assess absolute neutrophil count and vacuolated lymphocytes may also be helpful. Early morning urine analysis for amino-acids, organic acids and glycosamine glycans may further exclude metabolic disease.

Medical management
The objective of drug therapy in DCM is to give supportive relief and maximize cardiac function. There is not as yet a treatment that offers a cure.

Diuretic have an established role particularly in their ability to produce rapid symptom relief, but earlier use of ACE inhibitors has probably resulted in lower doses being used in recent years. ACE inhibitors have been consistently shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in adult studies, 4,5 Enalapril maleate was used in these series, there is limited information available on its use in children where captopril is most commonly prescribed. ACE inhibitors are generally well tolerated, their principle side effects include first dose hypotension, non-productive cough, and a risk of hyperkalaemia, especially in patients already on potassium supplements or potassium sparing diuretics.

Treatment with B-blockers needs also to be considered. The increased sympathetic drive that occurs as a compensatory mechanism in chronic heart failure appears to have an inverse relationship with prognosis 6,7. B-blockers down regulate this sympathetic overdrive 8 and the evidence that they improve outcome in adult patients with chronic heart failure is increasing 9,10,11. The a-adrenergic effects of the third generation B-blockers e.g. Carvedilol and Timolol also cause vasodilatation and this may be helpful.

Digoxin has a place as an orally active inotrope, but its failure to actively reduce mortality in adults 12 means it is increasingly relegated to second line therapy. Intravenous inotropes may occasionally be necessary to support the child in end stage cardiac failure. Their use is an indication for transplant assessment in some centres 13
 
 
Arrhythmias may also require treatment but this needs to be carefully evaluated, as many anti-arrhythmic drugs are negatively inotropic. All children with poor LV function are at risk of mural thrombus and should be treated prophylactically with aspirin, the detection of clot requires urgent anticoagulation (fig. 4). 

Growth hormone may be effective as add on therapy in the child who is failing to improve on conventional medical management. Early studies in adults 14 have shown improvement in LV function and exercise tolerance and reduced myocardial oxygen consumption with GH therapy that deteriorated when therapy was discontinued. In the future subcutaneous GH could have a role as a medical ‘bridge to transplantation’ but further work need to be done. 

Figure 4: Mural thrombus (MT) in a child with dilated cardiomyopathy 
Prognosis
Mortality for DCM is highest in the first year after diagnosis with a reported survival at 1 and 5 years after first presentation of 79% and 61% respectively.15 Early deaths are principally caused by severe heart failure. Some late deaths are sudden, presumably due to arrhythmia, in children who fail to recover to normal ventricular function. While it is accepted that the risk of mortality is high there is less agreement as to predictors of poor outcome. Failure of improvement or deterioration in shortening fraction, ventricular arrhythmias, detection of mural thrombus, presentation at age >2years, endocardial fibroelastosis and left ventricular end diastolic pressure > 20mmHg have all been put forward as adverse prognostic factors. 15,16,17,18

Mechanical and surgical support
 
Left ventricular assist devices and biventricular assist devices, although not widely available yet in the UK will have a role in the short term, providing a bridge to transplant for the child with intractable cardiac failure. In the future indwelling axial flow impeller pumps such as the JARVIK2000 Heart may have a place in the long term mechanical support of this difficult group of patients.19 (fig. 5). 
Figure 5: Axial flow impeller pump 
End stage cardiac failure secondary to DCM has been the most common indication for heart transplantation in children and adolescents. 20 Survival statistics post transplantation are improving. In a series reported from Great Ormond Street, Adwani reported survival for 95% at 1 year and 87% at 3 years, in patients transplanted for dilated cardiomyopathy.13 Currently the principle limiting factor in paediatric cardiac transplantation is a shortage of donor organs hence the importance of developing a mechanical support system suitable for use in the long term.

A second surgical option is the Batista operation where a partial left ventriculectomy is combined with mitral valve repair to restore left ventricular dimensions to normal thus improving pump function. Paediatric experience of this operation is limited but a 55% 2 year survival was reported in adult patients in the US, with most survivors showing symptomatic improvement.21

Conclusion
Management of children with dilated cardiomyopathy remains difficult but recent advances including early introduction of ACE inhibitors and B-blockers may improve what is currently a bleak outlook. In the future implantable left ventricular assist devices may provide interim mechanical support, but referral for transplantation remains the cornerstone of treatment.

References

  1. Robinson PJ, Sullivan ID, Kumpeng V, Anderson RH, MacCartney FJ. Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery form the pulmonary trunk: potential for false negative diagnosis with cross-sectional echocardiography. Br Heart J 1984;52:272-277
  2. Johnsrude CL, Perry JC, Cecchin F, O’Brian-Smith E, Fraley K, Friedman RA, Towbin JA. Differentiating Anomalous left main coronary artery originating form the pulmonary artery in infants from myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy by electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:71-74
  3. Michels VV, Moll PP, Miller FA et al. The Frequency of familial dilated cardiomyopathy in a series of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 1992;326:77-82
  4. The SOLVED Investigators. Effects of Enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1991;325:293-302
  5. The CONSENUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive cardiac failure; results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study. N Engl J Med 1987;316:1429-1435
  6. Podrid PJ et al . Role of the sympathetic nervous system in the genesis of ventricular arrhythmias. Circ 1990;82(Suppl 1):103-113
  7. Cohn JN, LevineTB, Olivara MT, et al Plasma norepinepharine as a guide to prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 1984;311:819-823
  8. Sackner-Bernstein JD, Mancini DM. Rational for treatment of patients with chronic heart failure with adrenergic blockade. JAMA 1995;274:1462-1467
  9. Bristow MR, Gilbert EM, Abraham WT et al. Carvedilol produces dose related improvements in left ventricular function and survival in subjects with chronic heart failure. Circ 1996;94:2807-2816
  10. Packer M, Collucci WS, Sackner-Bernstein JD, et al. Double blind, placebo controlled study of the effects of carvedilol in patients with moderate to severe heart failure: the PRECISE Trial: Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Carvedilol on Symptoms and Exercise. Circ 1996;94:2793-2799
  11. Australia/ New Zealand Heart Failure Research Collaborative Group. Randomised, placebo-controlled trial of heart failure in patients with congestive heart failure due to ischaemic heart disease. Lancet 1997;349:375-380
  12. The Digitalis Investigation Group. The effect if digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 1997;336:525-533
  13. Adwani SS, Whitehead BF, Rees PG, Whitmore P, J W Fabre, Elliot MJ, de Leval MR. Heart Transplantation for dilated cardiomyopathy. Arch Dis Child 1995;73:447-452
  14. Fazio S, Domenico S, Brunells C, Vigorito C, Giordano A, Raffaele G, Pardo F, Biondi B, Sacca L. A preliminary study of growth hormone in the treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 1996;334:809-814
  15. Burch M, Siddiqi S, Celermajer D, Scott C, Bull C, Deanfield J. Dilated cardiomyopathy in children: determinants of outcome. Br Heart J 1994;72:246-250.
  16. Griffin M, Hernandez A, Martin T, Goldring D, Bolman M, Spray T, Strauss A. Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Infants and Children. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:139 –144.
  17. Lewis A. Prognostic value of echocardiography in children with dilated cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J 1994;128:133-136.
  18. Arola A, Tuominen J, Ruuskanen O, Jokien E. Idiopathic Cardiomyopathy in Children: Prognostic Indicators and Outcome. Paediatrics 1998;101: 360-376
  19. Westaby S, Katsumata T, Houel R et al Jarvik 2000 Heart. Potentila for bridge to myocyte recovery. Circ 1998;98:1568-1574
  20. Hosenpud JD, Novick RJ, Breen TJ, Keck BS, Daily P. The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung transplantation: 12th official report 1995. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1995;14:805-815
  21. Fraizer OH, Benedict CR, Radovanceivc, B et al. Improved left ventricular function after chronic left ventricular off loading. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:675-682
Contact information
Dr. Mike Burch 
Consultant Paediatric Cardiologist 
John Radcliffe Hospital 
Oxford - UK 
Michael.Burch@orh.anglox.nhs.uk
Editor's Note
I would like to thank the following individuals for help in producing these first, in-house digitised animations: 
  1. Mr. Joe Mifsud of Mediamate Ltd, Malta
  2. Mr. David Zammit of Techpro Ltd, Malta
  3. Dr. Martin Balzan and Mr. Patrick Zammit, medical colleagues at St. Luke's Hospital, Malta
TopHome
BackIssue
Return to home page