| For the ancients, the functions of the heart and blood
vessels were a great mystery. Alcmaeon of Croton, a Greek (circa 500 BC),
suggested that sleep was caused by blood draining from the brain via the
veins, and that death was the result of the brain becoming completely drained.
Two hundred years later, Aristotle (384-322 BC) ascribed the power of thought
to the heart, which he contended also contained the soul. He also is credited
with the earliest observations of normal cardiovascular function by describing
the fetal pulsations in a chick embryo. After the death of Hippocrates,
medical thought and practice centred on Alexandria where the first great
medical school of antiquity was set up. The study of the human body reached
its full development with human dissection being permitted. The original
writings of the chief thinkers of the Alexandrian School have not been
preserved, but scrappy and imperfect knowledge has been afforded by later
Roman writers including Pliny, Celsius and Galen. The two most distinguished
names of the Alexandrian School included Herophilus and Erasistratus. |
Fig 4: Aristotle contemplating a
bust of Homer (Rembrandt)
|
| Herophilus of Chalcedon (circa 280 BC) was considered by Pliny to have
the honour of being the first physician "who searched into the causes of
disease". A pupil of Praxogaras he was the first to restrict the pulse
to a distinct group of vessels and held that it could be used as an indicator
of disease, Herophilus' most important contribution to clinical medicine
was his development of the theory of the diagnostic value of the pulse.
Herophilus counted the pulse, using the water-clock for the purpose, and
made many subtle analyses of its rate and rhythm. He was influenced by
the musical theories of the period (mainly those of Aristoxenus of Tarentum),
and from these, he built up a rhythmical pulse lore which continued in
medicine until recent times. He realised that the pulse is not an innate
faculty of the arteries, but was derived from the heart. He distinguished
the pulse not merely on quantitatively grounds, but also qualitatively
from palpitations, tremors and spasms, which are muscular in origin. Unfortunately,
since the pulse doctrine of Herophilus was based on musical tenants, it
was so complicated that only a skilled musician could possibly understand
it, and this the theory failed to gain ground4. |
Fig 5: Herophilus of Chalcedon
|
| Erasistratos of Iulis (250 BC) elaborated the view of the pneuma, one
form of which he believed came from the inspired air, and passed to the
left side of the heart and to the arteries of the body. It was the cause
of the heart-beat. Erasistratus argued, that intaken breath entered the
arteries, which thus carried nothing but air4. This erroneous
view was maintained for almost four centuries. It was disproved by Claudius
Galenus (AD 129-201) who showed by experiment that arteries carried blood
and not air. He studied the actions of the heart, the heart valves, and
the pulsations of arteries. Galen also noted the structural differences
between arteries and veins but did not realise that blood circulated. He
believed that blood was produced by the liver which sent it to the periphery
of the body in order to form flesh. He was also the first to attempt to
explain the function of the arterial duct and the foramen ovale5.
Galen subscribed to the humoral theory of bodily fluids, but he also believed
that sickness could arise from an insufficiency of one of the four humours,
and not only from an excess, a guiding principle of Galenic medicine. Galen
also believed that life was sustained by food, which was converted into
blood by the liver and sent to the rest of the body for nourishment. Galen
also believed that blood was used in the removal of wastes. Galen was thus
the first to suggest a relationship between food, blood and air. Medical
and church authorities considered Galen’s work to be based upon divine
inspiration and therefore infallible, dubbing him Divinus Galenus 4,5. |
Fig 6: Claudius Galenus
|
| Galen's views were to hold sway for several centuries until the birth
of modern science during the Italian Renaissance in the 15th and 16th centuries.
During this important period, medical knowledge was promulgated through
the translations of many ancient works, such as those of Hippocrates and
Galen. The move towards the study of human anatomy by secret dissection
which had been previously shackled by the infallibility ascribed to Galen's
doctrines based on animal studies, also helped open new horizons in pathological
anatomy. In 1513 the artist and scientist Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519)
drew and described a case of atrial septal defect. Leonardo also
subscribed to the Galenic theory of flux and reflux through the veins5.
|
Fig 7: Leonardo da Vinci
(self portrait)
|
|
Fig 8: Anatomical drawings of the circulatory system and the
heart by Leonardo
|
Drawing of the mitral valve
|
| The study of human anatomy freed itself completely from the shackles
of Galenic theory by the publication in 1543 of the first complete textbook
of human anatomy by Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564). Vesalius proposed that
the heart was the centre of the vascular network, and believed that the
pulmonary veins carried air from the lungs to the left atrium6.
Vesalius' monumental work opened the doors to further advances.
|
Fig 9:
Andreas Vesalius
|
| Michael Servetus (1511–53) was a Spanish physician who held certain
religious beliefs views, particularly with regard to the Holy Trinity,
that brought widespread condemnation from theologians both of the Reformation
and of the Roman Catholic Church. He changed his name to Michel de Villeneuve,
and spent some time in Paris studying medicine, where he became famous
for his dissecting and medical abilities. He also discovered that some
of the blood circulates through the lungs. Servetus was burned to death,
in part for publishing his views against the doctrine of the Trinity. The
execution was approved by Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Sir Thomas More.
Realdus Colombus (1516-1559) also showed that the pulmonary veins carry
blood, not air5 and Hieronymus Fabricius ab Acquapendente (1533-1619)
described valves in veins, recognising them as general structures in the
venous system and calling them little doors "ostiola"4,7. |
Fig 10: Hieronymus Fabricius
ab Acquapendente
|
| The English physician William Harvey (1578-1657) finally elucidated
the system of blood circulation. Harvey showed experimentally the function
of valves in maintaining centripetal flow in veins, thus establishing the
true concept of a circulation propelled by the heart, and refuting the
hallowed theories of Galen, laying the foundation for modern physiology8.
Harvey also proposed the existence of capillaries, which would link arterial
and venous systems, but was unable to demonstrate the capillary network
due to the lack of a microscope. |
|
Fig 12: Illustration from: Exercitatio anatomica
de motu cordis et sanguinis in animalibu
|
Fig 11: William Harvey
|
| René Descartes received Harvey's doctrine regarding the circulation
of blood positively but with reservations in 1637. A mechanist by profession,
Descartes viewed man as a machine, and Harvey's ideas about the circulation
of the blood fitted his mechanical concepts. Descartes however did not
believe that the heart contracted, but rather that it expanded. He believed
that the heart acted as a furnace; heating up the blood until it was gaseous,
which re-condensed into a fluid in the cool lungs4. |
Fig 13: René Descartes
|
| The final link to Harvey's concept was made by the discovery of capillaries
in frog experiments by Marcello Malpighi (1628-94). Malpighi also demonstrated
the existence of red blood cells and showed that they gave blood its colour. |
Fig 14: Marcello Malpighi
|
| Malphigi's findings were confirmed and developed by Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
(1632-1723), who demonstrated how red blood cells circulated through the
capillaries of a rabbit’s ear and the web of a frog's foot. In 1674, Leeuwenhoek
gave the first accurate description of red blood corpuscles. |
Fig 15: Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
|
| The 17th century also saw a revival of interest in CHD. Several congenital
cardiac malformations were described, including Fallot’s tetralogy described
by Steno (1638-1686) well before the condition’s clinical aspects were
emphasised9,10. Giovanni Battista Morgagni (1688-1771) whose
De sedibus et causis morborum per anatomen indagatis (1761) is one of the
great books in medical literature, described ventricular septal defect
and single ventricle heart11. From the 19th century, various
detailed descriptions of CHD began to be published, and the first book
dealing with the full spectrum of CHD was published in 185812
leading to today’s understanding of the pathophysiology of the numerous
lesions which comprise CHD13. |
Fig 16: Giovanni Battista Morgagni
|
The era of premortem diagnosis of congenital malformations began with the
discovery of auscultation by Rene` Theophile LaennecThe early decades of the twentieth century saw the increasing acceptance
of technological methods of diagnosis particularly related to radiology.
The early 1930s saw the introduction of effective cardiological investigations
with the use of cardiac catheterisation15. This method enabled
an accurate diagnosis to be made which, combined with advances in surgery
and anaesthesia, was to initiate operative interventions on the heart and
cardiovascular system in the 1940s, primarily with extracardiac procedures
such as ligation of a patent duct16. Intracardiac operations,
initially without and later with cardiopulmonary bypass, began to be undertaken
in the early 1950s. Initially however, apart from the correction of simple
lesions with relief of stenotic valves or closure of septal defects, only
palliation was possible for complex lesions, with operations aiming to
augment or reduce blood flow to the lungs in cyanotic lesions and lesions
causing heart failure respectively17,18. More complex operations
were eventually conceived with intracardiac re-routing of blood and the
replacement of missing structures by bridging with homograft tubes. This
meant that operations began to be less palliative and more curative.
The mid-1960s ushered the next major step with the first interventional
catheterisations19, allowing the postponement of surgery, and
eventually even replacing surgery for certain conditions in the early 1970s.
The last decades have introduced computing facilities which have increasingly
more massive calculating and storage capacities. These have allowed the
introduction of echocardiography, a very computer-intensive imaging technique.
This technique has proved to be a diagnostic milestone, eventually striving
to replace catheterisation for the diagnosis and follow-up of the vast
majority of congenital cardiac malformations20.